George Soros on The Economy, Reflexivity and Open Society, Central European University Lectures, 2009/10/26-30

George Soros is a practical philosopher, applying his knowledge in a world that thinks linearly.  I’ve been interested in his ideas on reflexivity, and less on financial markets, so the whole series of lectures were not of equal interest.

Lecture 1: General Theory of Reflexivity
Date: Monday, 26 October
Time: 2.00 p.m. – 4.00 p.m.
CETModerator: Colin McGinn
Videoconference with the London School of Economics

George Soros will present the fundamentals of his guiding philosophy, laying the foundation for his four subsequent lectures. This session discusses historical understandings of objective reality, scientific inquiry, and the limits of human perception. It discusses the gap between perceptions and reality, illustrating how actions based on these flawed perceptions then reshape reality in a reflexive system.

[Part 1 at]
[Part 2 at]
[Part 3 at]
[Q&A Introduction at]
[Q&A Part 1 at]
[Q&A Part 2 at]
[Q&A Part 3 at]

Lecture 2: Financial Markets
Date: Tuesday, 27 October
Time: 2.00 p.m. – 4.00 p.m. CET
Moderator: Anatole Kaletsky
Videoconference with Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This lecture applies the general theory of reflexivity to financial markets, challenging the prevailing paradigm of the efficient market hypothesis. George Soros will discuss bubbles and the recent financial crisis in detail, testing his theory against major financial events.

Lecture 3: Open Society
Date: Wednesday, 28 October
Time: 4.00 p.m. – 6.00 p.m.
Moderator: Ivan Krastev
Videoconference with Columbia University

In this session, George Soros discusses the concept of open society, which guides his philanthropy and is central to his political and social thinking. Over the past quarter century, Soros has devoted over seven billion dollars to promoting the underpinnings of this concept—from equal access to justice to freedom of expression—around the world, from South Africa to Poland to the United States. Here, he describes the historical and philosophical roots of open society. George Soros builds on Karl Popper’s thinking while stressing the central importance of fallibility, relating this to reflexivity, and applying these concepts to political and social reality. The lecture concludes by discussing the balance between individual freedom and regulation to protect the common good.

Lecture 4: Capitalism Versus Open Society
Date: Thursday, 29 October
Time: 2.00 p.m. – 4.00 p.m. CET
Moderator: Mark DannerVideoconference with the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

In this lecture, George Soros will explore the conflict between capitalism and open society, market values and social values. Focusing on the principal-agent problem, he will use contemporary economic and political examples to challenge market fundamentalism while presenting ideas for protecting the public good more effectively.

Lecture 5: The Way Ahead
Date: Friday, 30 October
Time: 1.00 p.m. – 3.00 p.m. CET
Moderator: Howard Davies
Videoconference with Hong Kong University

Turning his attention to the future, George Soros will focus on the increasingly important role that China is likely to play on the world stage. He will outline key global trends and discuss their major economic and political implications for the years ahead.

The CEU Lectures: George Soros on The Economy, Reflexivity and Open Society | Central European University


David Ing blogs at , photoblogs at , and microblogs at . See .

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Talk Video Streaming

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Beyond this media queue
This content is syndicated to Twitter. For professional perspectives, look to Coevolving Innovations; for a photoblog, look to Reflections, Distractions.
  • The Systems Approach and its Enemies Helps Us Find the Morality of a Revised Democracy | van Gigch | 2006
    In a book series celebrating C. West Churchman, John P. van Gigch digests (and portends to extend) The Systems Approach and its Enemies. On enemies … 4.1 A MATTER OF DEFINITIONS: ADVERSARIES VERSUS ENEMIES I note the similarity/difference between the words ‘enemy’ and ‘adversary.’ Other authors use the word adversary (ies) to denote all the […]
  • Restoring Legitimacy to the Systems Approach | Clinton J. Andrews | 2000
    A public policy professor, Clinton J. Andrews, looks at how The Systems Approach may encounter problems in skepticism from engineering practice. The systems approach is one general way of going about tackling a problem; some others include the experimental, political, moral, religious, and aesthetic approaches [1,p. 5], [2]. The systems approach to a problem […]
  • The Systems Approach: Its Variety of Aspects | Richard Mattessich | 1982
    An informed view of the Systems Approach from 1982.  (Richard Mattessich was a well-respected professor at UBC when I started in the doctoral program in 1982, but I wouldn’t get to appreciate the Systems Approach as described by C. West Churchman until the ISSS 1998 meeting). In his latest work [The Systems Approach and its […]
  • A logic model for philanthropic effectiveness | Peter Frumkin | 2006
    Program evaluation can be approached from the philanthropic perspective. In searching for ways to give money effectively, donors have many options and confront a wide range of theories about how to achieve impact. It is possible to think about these theories as falling into three main categories: theories of change, theories of leverage, and theories […]
  • Program Logic Models and Theory of Change | Kellogg Foundation | 2004
    From the program evaluation community, with the W.K. Kellogg Foundation … The program logic model is defined as a picture of how your organization does its work – the theory and assumptions underlying the program. A program logic model links outcomes (both short- and long-term) with program activities/processes and the theoretical assumptions/principles of t […]
  • Restoring Manjaro Grub after Ubuntu upgrade
    On a multi-boot Linux computer where Ubuntu has already been installed, adding on Manjaro Linux installs its own version of Grub (that I’ll call Arch-Grub) that is different but compatible with that previously installed (that I’ll call Debian-Grub). Updating Ubuntu to a newer version (or installing an older version) restores Debian-Grub, replacing the workin […]
I welcome your e-mail. If you don't have my address, here's a contact page.
%d bloggers like this: