John Hanke and Bernhard Seefeld, “The Evolution of the Geoweb” (MP3 audio), O’Reilly Media Where 2.0 Conference, IT Conversations, 2007/05/29

Many of the advances in the geoweb have come from Google.

If the rapid pace of the evolution of Geoweb is an indicator, then an opportunity is certainly emerging for all of us in this ecosystem to create a map of the world that will be more detailed, more comprehensive, more inclusive than any map that has ever been created; not a map of imagery, but of user annotations, of descriptions, images, movies and sounds. The underpinning for this annotation is the base map. Companies in the geo space are investing aggressively in enhancements to the base map, which will drive the creation of many more interesting applications. This also presents a very large economic opportunity, and also means there will be more mergers and acquisitions in this market.

Today, Google covers more than half the world’s population with high-resolution imagery. This has led to uses of the Geoweb beyond any of our expectations in the beginning. At the Search Innovation Day at Google this year, an application that could take any set of search results and view them on a map was launched. Alongside, we’ve launched Google SketchUp and Google StreetView, which provides 3-D, street level immersive photography with a broad zoom range.

We’re also ramping up our support for GeoRSS and making it available in the Google Maps API. We now index GeoRSS and it is available in geo searches. We’ve submitted KML to the Open Geospatial Consortium and they’ve made it an open standard. We’re working on the next version, which is fully vetted by the standard process. KML 2.2 specification has been made publicly available for review and feedback.

IT Conversations | O’Reilly Media Where 2.0 Conference | John Hanke, Bernhard Seefeld

[MP3 audio]

Advertisements
About

David Ing blogs at coevolving.com , photoblogs at daviding.com , and microblogs at http://ingbrief.wordpress.com . See .

Tagged with:
Posted in Talk Audio Download

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Translate
Beyond this media queue
This content is syndicated to Twitter. For professional perspectives, look to Coevolving Innovations; for a photoblog, look to Reflections, Distractions.
  • The Systems Approach and its Enemies Helps Us Find the Morality of a Revised Democracy | van Gigch | 2006
    In a book series celebrating C. West Churchman, John P. van Gigch digests (and portends to extend) The Systems Approach and its Enemies. On enemies … 4.1 A MATTER OF DEFINITIONS: ADVERSARIES VERSUS ENEMIES I note the similarity/difference between the words ‘enemy’ and ‘adversary.’ Other authors use the word adversary (ies) to denote all the […]
  • Restoring Legitimacy to the Systems Approach | Clinton J. Andrews | 2000
    A public policy professor, Clinton J. Andrews, looks at how The Systems Approach may encounter problems in skepticism from engineering practice. The systems approach is one general way of going about tackling a problem; some others include the experimental, political, moral, religious, and aesthetic approaches [1,p. 5], [2]. The systems approach to a problem […]
  • The Systems Approach: Its Variety of Aspects | Richard Mattessich | 1982
    An informed view of the Systems Approach from 1982.  (Richard Mattessich was a well-respected professor at UBC when I started in the doctoral program in 1982, but I wouldn’t get to appreciate the Systems Approach as described by C. West Churchman until the ISSS 1998 meeting). In his latest work [The Systems Approach and its […]
  • A logic model for philanthropic effectiveness | Peter Frumkin | 2006
    Program evaluation can be approached from the philanthropic perspective. In searching for ways to give money effectively, donors have many options and confront a wide range of theories about how to achieve impact. It is possible to think about these theories as falling into three main categories: theories of change, theories of leverage, and theories […]
  • Program Logic Models and Theory of Change | Kellogg Foundation | 2004
    From the program evaluation community, with the W.K. Kellogg Foundation … The program logic model is defined as a picture of how your organization does its work – the theory and assumptions underlying the program. A program logic model links outcomes (both short- and long-term) with program activities/processes and the theoretical assumptions/principles of t […]
  • Restoring Manjaro Grub after Ubuntu upgrade
    On a multi-boot Linux computer where Ubuntu has already been installed, adding on Manjaro Linux installs its own version of Grub (that I’ll call Arch-Grub) that is different but compatible with that previously installed (that I’ll call Debian-Grub). Updating Ubuntu to a newer version (or installing an older version) restores Debian-Grub, replacing the workin […]
Contact
I welcome your e-mail. If you don't have my address, here's a contact page.
%d bloggers like this: